Update PR Checklist for 'via' keymaps (#24330)

This commit is contained in:
Joel Challis 2024-08-26 22:28:23 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 8b42e5fb8f
commit 530e044762
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -44,12 +44,14 @@ If there are any inconsistencies with these recommendations, you're best off [cr
Note that personal keymap submissions will no longer be accepted. This section applies to manufacturer-supported keymaps. Please see this [issue](https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/issues/22724) for more information.
:::
- PRs for vendor specific keymaps will be permitted. The naming convention for these should be `default_${vendor}`, `via_${vendor}` i.e. `via_clueboard`.
- vendor specific keymaps do not necessarily need to be "vanilla" and can be more richly featured than `default` or `via` stock keymaps.
- PRs for vendor specific keymaps will be permitted. The naming convention for these should be `default_${vendor}` i.e. `default_clueboard`.
- vendor specific keymaps do not necessarily need to be "vanilla" and can be more richly featured than `default` stock keymaps.
- `#include QMK_KEYBOARD_H` preferred to including specific board files
- prefer layer enums to #defines
- custom keycode enums must have first entry = `QK_USER`
- some care with spacing (e.g., alignment on commas or first char of keycodes) makes for a much nicer-looking keymap. Spaces are preferred to tabs
- keymaps should not enable VIA
- keymaps targeting VIA support should be submitted to the [VIA QMK Userspace](https://github.com/the-via/qmk_userspace_via) repository
## Keyboard PRs
@ -136,12 +138,12 @@ https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed+label%3Akeyboard
- `keymaps/default/keymap.c`
- `QMKBEST`/`QMKURL` example macros removed
- if using `MO(1)` and `MO(2)` keycodes together to access a third layer, the [Tri Layer](features/tri_layer) feature should be used, rather than manually implementing this using `layer_on/off()` and `update_tri_layer()` functions in the keymap's `process_record_user()`.
- default (and via) keymaps should be "pristine"
- default keymaps should be "pristine"
- bare minimum to be used as a "clean slate" for another user to develop their own user-specific keymap
- what does pristine mean? no custom keycodes. no advanced features like tap dance or macros. basic mod taps and home row mods would be acceptable where their use is necessary
- standard layouts preferred in these keymaps, if possible
- should use [encoder map feature](features/encoders#encoder-map), rather than `encoder_update_user()`
- default keymap should not enable VIA -- the VIA integration documentation requires a keymap called `via`
- default keymap should not enable VIA -- keymaps targeting VIA support should be submitted to the [VIA QMK Userspace](https://github.com/the-via/qmk_userspace_via) repository
- submitters can add an example (or bells-and-whistles) keymap showcasing capabilities in the same PR but it shouldn't be embedded in the 'default' keymap
- submitters can also have a "manufacturer-matching" keymap that mirrors existing functionality of the commercial product, if porting an existing board
- Do not include VIA json files in the PR. These do not belong in the QMK repository as they are not used by QMK firmware -- they belong in the [VIA Keyboard Repo](https://github.com/the-via/keyboards)
@ -174,7 +176,7 @@ Also, specific to ChibiOS:
- all core PRs must now target `develop` branch, which will subsequently be merged back to `master` on the breaking changes timeline
- as indicated above, the smallest set of changes to core components should be included in each PR
- PRs containing multiple areas of change will be asked to be split up and raised separately
- keyboard and keymap changes should only be included if they affect base keyboard builds, or the default-like `default`, `via`, `default_????` keymaps etc.
- keyboard and keymap changes should only be included if they affect base keyboard builds, or the default-like `default`, `default_????` keymaps etc.
- keymap modifications for anything other than the default-like keymaps **should not be included in the initial PR** in order to simplify the review process
- the core PR submitter should submit a followup PR affecting other keymaps after initial PR merge
- large-scale refactoring or consolidation PRs that affect other keymaps (such as renaming keycodes) should always be raised separately